← Search

Emily Whitehead

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sterrett, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 70W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history99 matches
L
2026-06-10 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lancaster
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lancaster
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-13 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Mathis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-16 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally McClanahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-06-24 · Hoover Met - Duck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Sandidge
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-22 · Hoover Met - Duck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Holmes
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-05-20 · Hoover Met - Duck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallory Carrington
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-05-13 · Hoover Met - Duck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Mathis
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-11-15 · Highland - Moore · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Wright
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-11-08 · Highland - Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Wright
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-11-01 · Highland - Moore · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-26 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Mathis
loading the estimate
6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.8% of games
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 66.1% of games
3.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 57.8% of games
5.5
100%
15W–0L · 72% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.5% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#1 Singles
20%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer