← Search

Nathan Kho

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gilbert, AZ
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 11W–4L · seasons 2021–2022
Match history15 matches
W
2022-08-09 · RVojjini (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-07-14 · RVojjini (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2022-07-13 · RVojjini (Queens) · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-06-09 · RVojjini (Queens) · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2021-07-12 · JYablonski/DDeMaine (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra To mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2021-06-17 · RVojjini/BMartens (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2021-06-14 · JYablonski/DDeMaine (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra To mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-06-10 · RVojjini/BMartens (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2021-05-24 · JYablonski/DDeMaine (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra To mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-12 · MEvans/JYablonski (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Digby
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2021-04-21 · MEvans/JYablonski (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Digby
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2021-04-13 · MEvans/JYablonski (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rakesh Kumar Vojjini
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 33% of the time
#2 Singles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Singles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams