← Search

Rebeca Cortazio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Worcester, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 85W–27L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history112 matches
L
2026-08-08 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Dias
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-5
L
2026-05-27 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Egger
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-20 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Cao
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · EHTC:Slice Lobsters:Lovejoy/Lovejoy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexander Grant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Jessica Paquette / Steven Hadge
2026-03-08 · EHTC:Slice Lobsters:Lovejoy/Lovejoy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexander Grant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-23 · LFW:Wayland:Trieu/Cunningham · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Thach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-09 · NETC:New England TC:Cortazio/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · NETC:New England TC:Cortazio/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
Sarah Dowden / Kaydin Pinto
2025-08-08 · NETC:New England TC:Cortazio/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-07-09 · NETC:New England TC:Cortazio/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grayson LaCroix
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-02 · NETC:New England TC:Cortazio/Hannigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
21W–0L · 77.1% of games
3.5
85.7%
24W–4L · 60.1% of games
4.0
59.1%
26W–18L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.7% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe