← Search

Maggie Egger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wellesley, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 43W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Cao championship
loading the estimate
0-1
L
2026-07-13 · WOB:Awesome Aces 4.0 40+:Hoffmann/Calleva · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Amitay
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · WOB:Awesome Aces 4.0 40+:Hoffmann/Calleva · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Pizzi
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · WOB:Awesome Aces 4.0 40+:Hoffmann/Calleva · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Amitay
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Chin
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · WOB:Awesome Aces 4.0 40+:Hoffmann/Calleva · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Amitay
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-5
L
2026-05-27 · WOB:Aces 4.0:Calleva/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebeca Cortazio
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · ESB:Tulip Tennis Club:Schneider/Cotroneo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Backs
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
L
2025-07-28 · WOB:Aces:Calleva/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Marchlik
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · WOB:Aces:Calleva/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hanneke de Vlaam - Siegers
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-16 · LFNT:Longfellow:Mar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jean Kelley
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-14 · WOB:Aces:Calleva/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hanneke de Vlaam - Siegers
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 50.4% of games
4.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 46.7% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.4% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams