← Search

Estelle Colgan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cummaquid, MA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 9W–12L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history21 matches
L
2025-02-06 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Cummings
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-4
W
2025-01-23 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolette Westbrook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-5
L
2024-10-17 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Cummings
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-06 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Casey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-06 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deanna Waldron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-4
L
2023-12-14 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Swansey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-4
L
2023-11-30 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Gochenour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-3
W
2023-11-16 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Swansey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-11-02 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Gochenour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-25 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-07-18 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2022-06-20 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elsbeth Rowaan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert