← Search

Tina Cummings

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Marstons Mills, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 12W–18L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history30 matches
L
2025-02-06 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Estelle Colgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-4
L
2025-01-16 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Metta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-09 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurel Fairweather
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-12-12 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurel Fairweather
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-14 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurel Fairweather
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-10-24 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Mosca
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-17 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Estelle Colgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-24 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Casey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-06-17 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Turo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-0
L
2024-05-16 · MCAC:Swansey:Swansey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Turo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-06-19 · KG:Kelly:Kelly · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Russell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-12 · KG:Kelly:Kelly · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Turo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
7.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer