← Search

John Hilton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kingsport, TN
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
38 matches · 8W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Betancourt mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Little mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Betancourt mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-06-29 · Little/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Porter mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-22 · Little/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Jackson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-20 · Little/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Janiszewski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-26 · Janiszewski/META · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tammy Buer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-24 · Janiszewski/META · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Janiszewski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-18 · Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Dimona mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-08 · Zhang/META · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Zhang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-02 · Janiszewski/META · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Czoka mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-29 · Janiszewski/META · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Czoka mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 35.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 34.8% of games
6.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert