← Search

Nicholas Fasola

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Concord Township, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
248 matches · 148W–100L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history248 matches
L
2026-10-24 · CX 7.5 MV1 Haught · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · C 7.5M MV2 Gau · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce Bensimone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-17 · CX 7.5 MV1 Haught · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · C 7.5M MV2 Gau · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Seth Vilensky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · CX 7.5 MV1 Haught · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chipo Jolibois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-14 · A40 4.0M MV1 Gau · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Gau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · A18 3.5M MV2 Nine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Haught
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Byrne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Cole
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 61.6% of games
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 57.8% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 42.6% of games
6.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 51% of games
7.5
35%
7W–13L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
58 matches
Singles
21%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
29 matches
#1 Singles
9%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams