← Search

Martin Laidler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chagrin Falls, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 54W–36L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-10-30 · C 7.5M WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Clayton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-10-23 · C 7.5M WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Clayton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-18 · C 7.5M WE Elefter · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Siebenschuh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-10-11 · C 8.5M 1 MM2 Horwich · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Horwich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-10 · C 7.5M WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Clayton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · C 7.5M WE Elefter · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Siebenschuh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · C 8.5M 1 MM2 Horwich · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Spencer Selman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · C 8.5M 1 MM2 Horwich · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Masterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Clayton championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Clayton championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Clayton championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 4 WE Elefter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Pruce
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.4% of games
4.0
68.1%
32W–15L · 58.2% of games
7.5
100%
9W–0L · 65.5% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
Singles
14%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer