← Search

Dawn Ritz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rowlett, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 153W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history235 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Team 6 Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-23 · Team 31 Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Carlson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-13 · Team 31 Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Fimbres
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-11 · Team 6 Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Sergiovanni
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · Team 6 Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · Team 31 Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Carlson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · Team 5 Holly Clapp/Dawn Ritz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Ritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · Team 5 Holly Clapp/Dawn Ritz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Ritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · Team 5 Holly Clapp/Dawn Ritz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Ritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with April Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-21 · Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheila Sergiovanni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Jost
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.6% of games
3.5
68.9%
93W–42L · 58.1% of games
4.0
50%
20W–20L · 49.4% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
9W–0L · 67.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 71.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams