← Search

Matthew Hoffman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Canada Flintridge, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 66W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history118 matches
W
2026-07-12 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Feiming Morgan mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-11 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · SGV Mixed Nuts-Hwang-Flint/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carter Ashforth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · SGV Mixed Nuts-Hwang-Flint/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-15 · SGV Band of Brothers-Buckwalter-Flint Cyn/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zarani Barrow
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-07 · SGV Band of Brothers-Buckwalter-Flint Cyn/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Anderson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-07 · SGV Mixed Nuts-Hwang-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
55%
33W–27L · 54.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 35.1% of games
2.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.5% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
24W–15L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer