Search

Kimberly Lamm

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 86W–102L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Kimberly Lamm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Roche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Lo.Jensen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Lamm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · Lo.Jensen18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Lamm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Roche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · NMAC.Friedman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · NMAC.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · NMAC.Crone · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Peach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Diana Kennedy / Lee Berrios-Smothers
2026-04-07 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.1% of games
3.0
42%
29W–40L · 46.1% of games
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 43.9% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.4% of games
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.5% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 51.1% of games
2.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert