← Search

Kimberly Lamm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 87W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history189 matches
W
Default
2026-10-21 · TOC.May · #1 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Roche
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Flowers
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Lo.Jensen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Lamm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · Lo.Jensen18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Lamm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Roche
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · NMAC.Friedman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Friedman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · NMAC.Friedman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Allard
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · NMAC.Crone · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Peach
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 51.3% of games
3.0
42%
37W–51L · 46.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.4% of games
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.5% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.1% of games
2.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#1 Singles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert