← Search

Robert Hansen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rome, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 65W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history129 matches
W
Brian Hammontree / Jackson Lance
2026-10-07 · Racket Scientists · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with J David Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara McFarlane mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sket Angland mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Jones mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Sequoyah/Bowers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steven Waters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · EVTA/Wayne Harper · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Lamb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · EVTA/Wayne Harper · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Lamb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · EVTA/Wayne Harper · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Greeson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-31 · Angland/Calhoun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Sorrow
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-27 · Hansen, Rob · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Andersen
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · Angland/Calhoun · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robbie Armstrong
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-17 · Angland/Calhoun · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff McBrayer
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
46.9%
30W–34L · 49.3% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.9% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.9% of games
3.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 57% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer