← Search

Brian Hammontree

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ROME, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 63W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history102 matches
W
J David Smith / Jr Ramrakhyani
2026-10-14 · Tennis Dawgs · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Harper
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-07 · Tennis Dawgs · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Lance
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
Philip Schmidt / Christopher Hebert
2026-09-30 · Tennis Dawgs · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with James Angland
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
Megan McAbee / Christopher Hebert
2026-09-29 · Tennis Dawgs · #1 Mixed Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara McFarlane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-17 · Joey Still/Hamilton · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Hannah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-10 · Joey Still/Hamilton · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenton Boss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Joey Still/Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donald Groseclose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · Joey Still/Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Clint Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Joey Still/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Clint Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · EVTA/Scott King · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · EVTA/Scott King · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott King championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · EVTA/Scott King · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chastain championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.7% of games
3.0
77.5%
31W–9L · 62.1% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.4% of games
5.5
50%
10W–10L · 51.5% of games
6.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.6% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams