← Search

Soheil Shirzadi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mc Lean, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 206W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history277 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jun Choi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-24 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jun Choi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Limbago championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Limbago championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Harirchian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Coyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-2
W
2026-07-22 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Limbago
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · Team 4 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenny Day
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6
W
Default
2026-03-07 · Team 2 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Laukitis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-05 · Team 2 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Laukitis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-08 · Team 2 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Leslie
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-03 · Team 2 Westwood Team Fever Tree · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Laukitis
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
90%
36W–4L · 65.9% of games
4.0
78.6%
55W–15L · 59.5% of games
4.5
62.5%
30W–18L · 55.2% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.4% of games
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 61.9% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 57.9% of games
8.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 51% of games
9.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
64 matches
#1 Singles
8%
23 matches
Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams