← Search

Jonathan Vissering

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fulton, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
552 matches · 364W–188L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history552 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-24 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · Chau - The McFlys · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Curtis Cavey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-09-30 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-24 · Chau - The McFlys · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Samuel Borchers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Chau - The McFlys · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Harry Hu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-09 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams102 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.5
71.1%
145W–59L · 57.9% of games
8.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 55% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games
0.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
72.3%
73W–28L · 58.2% of games
8.5mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.1% of games
9.0mixed
59.1%
94W–65L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
260 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
146 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
130 matches
#2 Singles
1%
7 matches
#1 Singles
0%
2 matches
#2 Male Doubles
0%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams