← Search

Brad DeWael

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 90W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron McClure
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Short
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Short
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Walpole
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Gomez
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Hines
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Green
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron McClure
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denis Ryan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Gomez
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vitaliy Koval
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lonnie Lindsey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
95.2%
20W–1L · 79.3% of games
3.5
73.7%
42W–15L · 59.5% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.3% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.4% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 38.2% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 59.1% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#1 Singles
13%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert