← Search

Earl Allen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 169W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCE Poe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Green
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Clark mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Poe championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-22 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCE Poe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Poe
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-18 · Indy CX 8.5 MRC Cooper · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Mattax mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCE Dalton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Dietrich championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Indy A55 8.0M RRRC Coghlan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Poe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Green championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A55 8.0M RRRC Coghlan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Poe
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A40 4.0M LCHS Poe · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Gaynor
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M LCHS Poe · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Tetrault
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0M LCHS Poe · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Henkel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.3% of games
4.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 57.5% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games
8.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 59% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.1% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
64W–16L · 58.4% of games
8.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
85%
17W–3L · 66.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe