← Search

Laura Vetter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 149W–90L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history239 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Boyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-11-01 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Port mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-25 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anthony Cargill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · Willow Oaks Gregory · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shawn Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · Willow Oaks Gregory · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shawn Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-18 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anthony Cargill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-08 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yancey Haas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheri Stringer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Giancaspro
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farrell Harwood
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Schaaf
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · 12 Willow Oaks Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tia Thomas
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 63.2% of games
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 54.5% of games
3.5
60%
48W–32L · 55.6% of games
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51% of games
5.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.9% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 55.3% of games
6.5mixed
75%
15W–5L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 60.7% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
38 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe