← Search

Yancey Haas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 169W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history271 matches
L
2026-10-30 · WO Kelly/Crowell Combo WeekDAY · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Granger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-18 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Port mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · Willow Oaks Haas Combo Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Boyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-08 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Vetter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-25 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Farrell Harwood
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Willow Oaks Stalls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Farrell Harwood
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Crotty
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Crotty
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · 12 Willow Oaks Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Farrell Harwood
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucia O'Connell
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Hendrix
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 71.2% of games
3.5
66%
35W–18L · 56.4% of games
4.0
56.9%
37W–28L · 51.7% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.3% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.8% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 64.5% of games
6.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
55%
22W–18L · 52.8% of games
7.5mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
57 matches
#1 Singles
9%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe