← Search

Alison Avery

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 123W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history241 matches
W
2026-10-17 · University of Richmond AVERY · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Carman championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-17 · University of Richmond AVERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Harper championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · University of Richmond AVERY · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Smith championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-19 · University of Richmond AVERY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Carman championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · CCV Avery · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leemore Burke
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-09-01 · CCV Avery · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Young
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · CCV AVERY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Purcell
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · CCV Avery · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hyde Loupassi
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · CCV AVERY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Hodges
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · CCV Avery · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Huffman
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · CCV Avery · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Galanti
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · CCV Bartzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Young
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53.8%
93W–80L · 51.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games
8.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
54 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova