← Search

Heather Swann

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
97 matches · 66W–31L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.0
7 of 22
WA · 4.0
216 of 782

Heather is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heather has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.02021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Heather has gone from the 22nd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 75% of games
4.0
73.6%
39W–14L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Duenhoelter
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Smith
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Anna Halbur / Heidi Dalrymple
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Heinlein
−0.010about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Simonson
−0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Cubanski
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandy Nakada
−0.023below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-08-26 · #2 Doubles · with Sara Simonson
−0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Estera Clark / Patricia Boardchamps
2023-08-26 · #3 Doubles · with Brandy Nakada
−0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2023-08-25 · #2 Doubles · with Brandy Nakada
−0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
David Smith / Debbie Gilmanmixed
2023-08-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Duggan
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Sara Simonson
−0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Kim de Booij - Moors / Suzanne Eichenlaubchamps
2023-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Brandy Nakada
−0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.