← Search

Katie Gerecke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Henrico, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 113W–126L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history239 matches
L
2026-10-30 · KRA weekday 8.5 - Gerecke · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Rhoades
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-10 · Westwood Cruel Summer - Murtaugh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becca Meekins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-10 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlyle Walek
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-31 · Westwood Cruel Summer - Murtaugh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becca Meekins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-08-30 · KRA - Double Trouble - Gerecke · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bobbie Lou Oley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-08-25 · KRA Gerecke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Murtaugh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-24 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Dickinson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · KRA - Double Trouble - Gerecke · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · RCC Samuels/Greiner · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Feinstein
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbie Lou Oley
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · KRA Gerecke · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlyle Walek
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · KRA - Double Trouble - Gerecke · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Gerecke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
68.1%
32W–15L · 57.9% of games
4.0
43.9%
47W–60L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.5% of games
8.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47.3% of games
7.5mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
24.1%
7W–22L · 44.1% of games
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal