Search

Nathan Grice

Gig Harbor, WA
0.0 year-end
58 matches · 25W–33L · seasons 20192023
Where Nathan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Nathan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nathan has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Nathan has gone from the 24th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.3% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.5% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2022-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Snow
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Preston Dumas
+0.007about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Brendan Peters / Susanne Neupauermixed
2022-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Westfall
0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Crittenden
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Darrin Mithun / Chad Smed
2022-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Westfall
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jonathan Le / Calvey Khim
2022-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Westfall
+0.009about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Westfall
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mark Horn / Nolle Pritchard
2022-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malaier
+0.099better than expected — took 86% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coles
0.005below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clarence Hollins
+0.026about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.