← Search

Jennifer Schweikert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shalimar, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 36W–20L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history56 matches
L
2026-05-01 · Cerny - Shalimar Pointe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Smith mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Team Batman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Violette mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · Cerny - Shalimar Pointe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brodie Bowman mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Cerny - Shalimar Pointe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brodie Bowman mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-08-14 · Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Otero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-08 · Terminetters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Otero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-18 · Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Roberson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-06 · Hughes - Shalimar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-17 · Garfield-Shalimar Pointe · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Moya Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-10 · Garfield-Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Moya Peterson
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-03 · Garfield-Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dianna Dylewski
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-06 · Garfield-Shalimar Pointe · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dianna Dylewski
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe