← Search

Gil Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FORT WALTON BEACH, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history22 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Cerny - Shalimar Pointe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carly Wilson mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-01 · Cerny - Shalimar Pointe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Schweikert mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-26 · Hughes - Shalimar · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Schweizer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-04-06 · Hughes - Shalimar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Schweikert mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-29 · Hughes - Shalimar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Schweizer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-15 · Hughes - Shalimar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-26 · CSRC EVANS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amadee Pepper
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-06-05 · CSRC EVANS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Evan Evans
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-29 · CSRC EVANS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amadee Pepper
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-15 · CSRC EVANS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Riley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-05-08 · CSRC EVANS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amadee Pepper
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-24 · CSRC EVANS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amadee Pepper
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert