← Search

Stephanie Baas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brentwood, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 138W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history226 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Fisher/Baas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Baron
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Fisher/Baas/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Lawson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Fisher/Baas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angie Howard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shalini Rose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Blalock
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalini Rose
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lacey Keally
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lacey Keally
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon McWaters
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-24 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Adler
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 79.6% of games
3.0
83.8%
31W–6L · 61.8% of games
3.5
76.1%
51W–16L · 60.9% of games
4.0
35.9%
23W–41L · 45.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 37.8% of games
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 61.8% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 59% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
16%
37 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova