← Search

Beth Martin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
284 matches · 202W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history284 matches
W
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skipper championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skipper championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Hirst championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-07 · Hermann/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Hirst
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-30 · Hermann/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skipper
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephanie Baas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shalini Rose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Robinson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Cowdrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephanie Baas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · Robinson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Cowdrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skipper championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skipper championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
86.4%
38W–6L · 64.5% of games
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 61.2% of games
4.0
74.5%
73W–25L · 60.7% of games
4.5
39.5%
15W–23L · 43.9% of games
5.5
100%
8W–0L · 78.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 61% of games
7.5
68%
17W–8L · 58.4% of games
8.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
53 matches
#1 Singles
11%
32 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer