← Search

Ted Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Simons Island, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 158W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history233 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Good
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-13 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Shelby
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-29 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Shelby
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-22 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Shelby
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Leigh Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Leigh Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #3 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Buffy Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Buffy Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Epworth/Patrick Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Birge
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Epworth/Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Johns
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · Epworth/Patrick Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Birge
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Epworth/Patrick Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Birge
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 56% of games
3.5
50%
29W–29L · 50.6% of games
4.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 60.7% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 73.7% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 64% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60% of games
8.5
75%
21W–7L · 58.2% of games
0.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58.9% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
16W–0L · 72.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
172 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
10 matches
Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert