← Search

Tim Good

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brunswick, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 124W–113L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history237 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Williams
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-13 · Epworth/Tim Good · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Luppino
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Epworth/Tim Good · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Luppino
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-01 · Epworth/Tim Good · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Shelby
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Tina Daniel / Van Duke
2026-08-02 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Jennifer Agnew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
Eleanor Luppino / Gary Mallard
2026-07-19 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Jennifer Agnew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Jennifer Agnew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Epworth/Keith Pounds · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billy Copelan
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Epworth/Billy Copelan · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Jennifer Agnew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Epworth/Keith Pounds · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Thompson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Epworth/Keith Pounds · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Thompson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · Epworth/Keith Pounds · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Becker
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.3% of games
3.0
49.2%
32W–33L · 50.7% of games
3.5
48.2%
27W–29L · 51% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.5% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.5
100%
7W–0L · 71.2% of games
8.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.4% of games
8.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 46.6% of games
0.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61% of games
3.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.9% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 70.8% of games
8.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#1 Singles
6%
13 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal