← Search

Tina Daniel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Simons Island, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 96W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history141 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Keith Pounds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Van Duke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
Nick Luppino / Eleanor Luppino
2026-07-26 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Keith Pounds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Epworth/Haines & Pounds · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Patrick Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · GIT/Lauren Haines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Davis championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-3
W
2026-06-01 · GIT/Lauren Haines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Ballesteros championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · GIT/Lauren Haines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Post championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · GIT/Lauren Haines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Ballesteros championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · GIT/Lauren Haines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Ballesteros championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Epworth/Tina Daniel & Patrick Anderson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 59% of games
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.7% of games
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 56.9% of games
5.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 69.6% of games
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 73.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.2% of games
3.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.9% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 66% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
30 matches
Singles
12%
17 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert