← Search

John Prince

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
280 matches · 205W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history280 matches
W
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/Bottone/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Hughes-Carpenter/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Carpenter
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-10-25 · LCTA54/Bottone/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Gerard
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-24 · LCTA54/Bottone/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pierre Leblanc
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-17 · LCTA54/Bottone/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pierre Leblanc
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA55/Miller/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · LCTA55/Bottone/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · LCTA55/Bottone/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Bottone
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · LCTA55/Bottone/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Smith
loading the estimate
4-3
W
2026-03-09 · LCTA40/Prince-Carpenter/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Carpenter
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · LCTA55/Bottone/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Smith
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-04 · LCTA40/Prince-Carpenter/Park West · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
80%
24W–6L · 64% of games
3.5
77.7%
108W–31L · 60.2% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 44% of games
6.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 58.5% of games
7.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 51% of games
3.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.6% of games
6.0mixed
75%
27W–9L · 63.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
62 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert