← Search

Charles Obrien

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 152W–69L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history221 matches
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Hughes-Carpenter/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott MacKes
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA54/Miller/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Ambrose
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA54/Miller/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Curry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · LCTA54/Miller/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Galt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-13 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Hughes-Carpenter/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Cleary
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-06 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Avallone
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA39/Hughes-Carpenter/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-29 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Tunick
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Hughes-Carpenter/ParkWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-20 · LCTA55/Miller/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paul Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
77.1%
64W–19L · 61.4% of games
3.5
69.6%
39W–17L · 57.7% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.4% of games
6.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 59.3% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
3.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56.8% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer