← Search

Scott MacKes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 89W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history144 matches
W
2026-11-03 · LCTA18/Howle/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Dahlman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Howle/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Winebrenner
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA18/Howle/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Norman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA18/Howle/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Norman
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Obrien
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/Howle/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Winebrenner
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-10-20 · LCTA39/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Smith
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Howle/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Norman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-08 · LCTA39/Howle/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Winebrenner
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Howle/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Dahlman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · LCTA18/Howle/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Myers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · LCTA40/Tunick/PW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reed Spring
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
20W–5L · 63.1% of games
3.5
60.5%
49W–32L · 53.8% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.6% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 45.4% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams