← Search

Reed Spring

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 116W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history168 matches
L
2026-08-17 · LCTA40/Tunick/PW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott MacKes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · LCTA40/Tunick/PW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Doug Gerard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · LCTA40/Tunick/PW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott MacKes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Hopkins mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-21 · LCTA40/Tunick/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · LCTA40/Tunick/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindy Spring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-04 · LCTA40/Prince-Carpenter/Park West · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-18 · LCTA40/Prince-Carpenter/Park West · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-28 · LCTA40/Prince-Carpenter/Park West · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-12-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Ecarius
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Tatro
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Gerard
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 64.8% of games
3.5
74.7%
56W–19L · 58.8% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.4% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.4% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 69.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Singles
20%
33 matches
#2 Singles
8%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert