← Search

Patrick Friday

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history25 matches
L
2025-03-08 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-03-07 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-03-01 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-8
L
2025-03-01 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-8
L
2025-02-01 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-02-01 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-01-25 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Justo Marin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-8
L
2025-01-25 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Justo Marin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-8
L
2024-03-09 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene McCarron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-8
W
2024-03-09 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene McCarron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
8-6
W
2024-03-02 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene McCarron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
8-1
W
2024-03-02 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene McCarron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
8-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 64.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–8L · 25.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe