← Search

Mark Ramsey

— year-end
17 matches · 1W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mark Ramsey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-03-28 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Hanlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garrett van Osdell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garrett van Osdell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garrett van Osdell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-05-10 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-05-03 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justo Marin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-05-03 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justo Marin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-03-08 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Friday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2025-03-07 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Friday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2025-03-01 · Peterson-Swinging Petes-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Friday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 0% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.7% of games
8.0
0%
0W–8L · 22.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe