← Search

Pam Lobley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
River Edge, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 5W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Rhee
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Dembek
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Daly
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Rhee
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Daly
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-15 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becky Glaser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-24 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alice Heffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-17 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hecht
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-03 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alice Heffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-25 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Glaser
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-18 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Riger
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-09 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Hecht
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 36.5% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#2 Singles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe