← Search

Jody Riger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fair Lawn, NJ
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 8W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Sweet
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Song
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Schor Babin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Schor Babin
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Dembek
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-05 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Schor Babin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-15 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Depaola
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-07-08 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Tudisco
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-6
L
2025-06-17 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alice Heffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-25 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Schor Babin
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-18 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Lobley
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-11 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Dembek
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
18.4%
7W–31L · 33.1% of games
6.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe