← Search

Linda Depaola

— year-end
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Linda Depaola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2025-08-05 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-07-15 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody Riger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Anita Srivastava / Katina Britton
2025-06-24 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Dembek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Marianne Brodeck / Anita Carr
2025-06-17 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Dembek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-07-20 · Team Palish · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karolina Samulak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Karen McMahon / Nancy Kim
2021-07-13 · Team Palish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2021-07-06 · Team Palish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Shorr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2021-06-29 · Team Palish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2021-06-22 · Team Palish · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Shorr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-06-15 · Team Palish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-05-25 · Team Palish · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Shorr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2019-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pia Bisesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams2 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.9% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert