Teams

Net Assets

2025 55&Over Women · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-05vs Acing gracefullyWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Glaser / Kathy Hecht vs Joyce Schimmel / Denise Branca6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Schor Babin / Jody Riger vs Jane Vandervalk / Leslie Gaul1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Depaola / Jill Rothenberg vs Alison Hall-Goldman / Regina Wasserman6-2, 7-6
2025-07-29vs Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Daly / Becky Glaser vs Christine Eckels / Marianne Brodeck6-7, 5-5
L#2 DoublesAlice Heffner / Lisa Schor Babin vs Martha Morley / Carmen Tucaben0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Tudisco / Theresa Dembek vs Dawn Foster / Tara Callaghan5-7, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Glaser / Jane Daly vs Marianne Brodeck / Tara Callaghan7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Rothenberg / Susan Tudisco vs Dawn Foster / Nina Gold7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Song / Alice Heffner vs Niena Jerdee / Kelly Buchsbaum6-0, 6-1
2025-07-15vs Acing gracefullyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBecky Glaser / Pam Lobley vs Denise Branca / Joyce Johnson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Depaola / Jody Riger vs Margaret Simonetti / Grexan Wulff6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTheresa Dembek / Jane Daly vs Linda Weisberger / Denise Monaghan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-08vs Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky Glaser / Alice Heffner vs Christine Eckels / Niena Jerdee0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Daly / Lisa Schor Babin vs Tara Callaghan / Martha Morley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJody Riger / Susan Tudisco vs Carmen Tucaben / Anita Carr5-7, 5-6
2025-06-24vs Acing gracefullyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Hecht / Jane Daly vs Jane Vandervalk / Joyce Schimmel0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPam Lobley / Alice Heffner vs Leslie Gaul / Margaret Simonetti1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Depaola / Theresa Dembek vs Anita Srivastava / Katina Britton1-6, 1-6
2025-06-17vs Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Hecht / Pam Lobley vs Niena Jerdee / Martha Morley2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Heffner / Jody Riger vs Marlene Guinchard / Julie Wright0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Depaola / Theresa Dembek vs Marianne Brodeck / Anita Carr1-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs Acing gracefullySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Hecht / Jane Daly vs Joyce Schimmel / Joyce Johnson5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPam Lobley / Alice Heffner vs Denise Monaghan / Linda Weisberger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Susan Tudisco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Becky Glaser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Alice Heffner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Donna Song
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Daly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jill Rothenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jody Riger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Hecht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Schor Babin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Lobley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Theresa Dembek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Hecht + Jody Riger2440% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Hecht + Jane Daly044 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Dembek + Jody Riger033 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Dembek + Jill Rothenberg033 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Hecht + Pam Lobley033 matchesnot enough data
Becky Glaser + Jane Daly123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Schor Babin + Jody Riger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Tudisco
32W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Becky Glaser
23W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Alice Heffner
8W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Donna Song
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jane Daly
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Rothenberg
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jody Riger
8W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Hecht
13W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Schor Babin
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Lobley
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Dembek
2W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.