Teams

Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0W

2025 55&Over Women · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-12vs Acing gracefullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Wright / Marlene Guinchard vs Denise Branca / Jane Vandervalk6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNina Gold / Niena Jerdee vs Joyce Johnson / Leslie Gaul6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDawn Foster / Tara Callaghan vs Grexan Wulff / Katina Britton6-1, 6-4
2025-07-29vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Marianne Brodeck vs Jane Daly / Becky Glaser7-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesMartha Morley / Carmen Tucaben vs Alice Heffner / Lisa Schor Babin6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDawn Foster / Tara Callaghan vs Susan Tudisco / Theresa Dembek7-5, 6-3
2025-07-22vs Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarianne Brodeck / Tara Callaghan vs Becky Glaser / Jane Daly6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Foster / Nina Gold vs Jill Rothenberg / Susan Tudisco5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Kelly Buchsbaum vs Donna Song / Alice Heffner0-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Niena Jerdee vs Becky Glaser / Alice Heffner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTara Callaghan / Martha Morley vs Jane Daly / Lisa Schor Babin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarmen Tucaben / Anita Carr vs Jody Riger / Susan Tudisco7-5, 6-5
2025-07-01vs Acing gracefullyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Wright / Marlene Guinchard vs Leslie Gaul / Joyce Johnson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Martha Morley vs Margaret Simonetti / Grexan Wulff6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNina Gold / Carmen Tucaben vs Denise Monaghan / Katina Britton6-1, 6-0
2025-06-17vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Martha Morley vs Kathy Hecht / Pam Lobley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarlene Guinchard / Julie Wright vs Alice Heffner / Jody Riger6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarianne Brodeck / Anita Carr vs Linda Depaola / Theresa Dembek6-1, 6-4
2025-06-10vs Acing gracefullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Joyce Schimmel / Leslie Gaul6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Wright / Marlene Guinchard vs Alison Hall-Goldman / Regina Wasserman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNina Gold / Carmen Tucaben vs Anita Srivastava / Grexan Wulff6-4, 6-2
2025-05-27vs Acing gracefullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesNina Gold / Niena Jerdee vs Joyce Schimmel / Regina Wasserman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarlene Guinchard / Julie Wright vs Katina Britton / Grexan Wulff6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Linda Weisberger / Anita Srivastava6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Easten/Jerdee/55&Over6.0W712138134
2Acing gracefully2671736235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Martha Morley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Niena Jerdee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Christine Eckels
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Carmen Tucaben
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Tara Callaghan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Dawn Foster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Julie Wright
published
Marianne Brodeck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marlene Guinchard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nina Gold
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Foster + Marianne Brodeck2538% games−9.0% vs expected
Christine Eckels + Martha Morley7070% gamesnot enough data
Niena Jerdee + Nina Gold224 matchesnot enough data
Niena Jerdee + Martha Morley213 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Tucaben + Nina Gold303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Morley
16W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
Niena Jerdee
25W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Christine Eckels
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Carmen Tucaben
28W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Tara Callaghan
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Dawn Foster
18W–29L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.31
Julie Wright
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Brodeck
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Guinchard
29W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Gold
9W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.