← Search

Tracey Vincent

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 1W–18L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history19 matches
L
2025-07-23 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naveen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-09 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patty Tobiasz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-23 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Burr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-08-14 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naveen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-24 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-15 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Malin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-24 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-15 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Singhal-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Grady mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-15 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Singhal-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Grady mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-19 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Singhal-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Grady mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-03-19 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Singhal-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Grady mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-21 · MSIL 3.0W A18&O Burr/Han-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Burr
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal