← Search

Nancy Edwards

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbus, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 6W–19L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history25 matches
W
2025-02-11 · USTA Campus-Adams · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Chandler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-04 · USTA Campus-Adams · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Chandler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-01-26 · USTA Campus-Adams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie George
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-14 · USTA Campus-Adams · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie George
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-07 · USTA Campus-Adams · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arlene Adams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-25 · Solivita-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schmidt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-02-13 · ORANGE/Adams/Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lillian Gillman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-01-28 · ORANGE/Adams/Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Barkley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-4
L
2024-01-14 · Solivita-Adams · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darcy Cobb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-01-13 · Solivita-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Barkley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-26 · Solivita-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schmidt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-02-14 · Orange- Solivita-Adams · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Barkley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
6.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.4% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova