← Search

Kaley Cantu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lubbock, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 38W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Bustamante
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lydia Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cody Boggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-08-11 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camille Cruz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cori Hanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-19 · Jenkins/Simpson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Reinke
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · Jenkins/Simpson · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Minnie Caudle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Morgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-27 · Ceja · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with E J Cantu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-27 · Ceja · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with E J Cantu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-10 · Ceja · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with E J Cantu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 42.4% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert