← Search

Clay Stout

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 113W–60L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-10-20 · LifeTime - Hutto/Stout · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Benson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-13 · LifeTime - Hutto/Stout · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Lewis
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-15 · LifeTime - Hutto/Stout · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JR Penick
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · LifeTime - Hutto/Stout · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Benson
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Benson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Benson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackson Moyers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · BH - Nelson/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Barrow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · BH - Nelson/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Moody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurence Baird
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · BH - Nelson/Taylor · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Moody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.5
77.3%
51W–15L · 60% of games
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.7% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 49% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 61% of games
3.5mixed
75%
18W–6L · 57.1% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer