← Search

Jamie Kim

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 80W–54L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jamie Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-03 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · AYTC-Net Gains-Kim · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Lumin Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
L
2026-03-01 · AYTC-Net Gains-Kim · #1 Female Singles · 4.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
W
2026-02-07 · AYTC-Net Gains-Kim · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Lumin Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.2% of games
3.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 54.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.2% of games
3.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Female Doubles
18%
24 matches
#1 Female Singles
13%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer