Alice Chang
Seattle, WA
70 matches · 46W–24L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Alice Chang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history70 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.8% of games
3.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50% of games
0.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.6% of games
3.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#1 Female Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Female Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.