Search

Rebecca Garibay

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
52 matches · 29W–23L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
134 of 342
WA · 3.5
544 of 1460

Rebecca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rebecca has gone from the 2nd to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
Angela Cummings / Susanna Hoke
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Chang
+0.015better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Mary Jean Waite
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.029below expectation — took 63% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Upasna Suman / Iskra Ivanova
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Viktoria Zlatinova
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jane Zhu
2026-03-08 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
0.053below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-3
W
Saung Mundt / Katherine Matias
2026-02-21 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Berkeley
0.001about as expected — took 60% of games against 59% expected
6-4
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
+0.011better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4
L
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonas Albert Nocom
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Baik
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Neesha Pinnaduwage / Elijah Simpsonmixed
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenny Hulpach
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Hoang
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-09 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.004about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.