← Search

Stephanie Gillmor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 85W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Simpson/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Tuck
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-21 · Broome/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Jagar
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-09 · Simpson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Tuck
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-02 · Simpson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Tuck
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Laub championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-04 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Laub
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-26 · Andrews/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Laub
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · Andrews/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Laub
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Andrews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Laub
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · Andrews/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Lee/Gillmor/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Jagar championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 39.4% of games
3.0
60%
27W–18L · 55.6% of games
3.5
80.4%
37W–9L · 58.8% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 42.7% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert